The Daily WTF: Curious Perversions in Information Technology
Welcome to TDWTF Forums Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

Making really sure

Last post 07-21-2008 12:16 PM by Sunstorm. 35 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (36 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 07-14-2008 5:01 PM

    • jefg
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 07-14-2008
    • Posts 1

    Making really sure

    <table width="90%" border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0  border=0>
  • 07-14-2008 5:09 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    Invalid HTML != WTF

    World class IT solutions for your industry -- call for free quote
    Filed under:
  • 07-14-2008 6:22 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    AccessGuru:

    Invalid HTML != WTF

     

    AccessGuru != DBA 

    Filed under:
  • 07-14-2008 6:51 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    Dude, I've built over 30 enterprise-level ODBC database apps.  I bet you can't even program in sequel.  

    World class IT solutions for your industry -- call for free quote
  • 07-14-2008 7:08 PM In reply to

    • chrisb
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 05-18-2008
    • Posts 5

    Re: Making really sure

    AccessGuru:

    Dude, I've built over 30 enterprise-level ODBC database apps.  I bet you can't even program in sequel.  

     

    Sequel?

  • 07-14-2008 7:14 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    AccessGuru:

    Dude, I've built over 30 enterprise-level ODBC database apps.  I bet you can't even program in sequel.  

     

    SQLs not a programming language, it's a query language, so noone can really program in it. Procedural augmentations to SQL such as PL/SQL are a different matter.

  • 07-14-2008 7:17 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    jefg:
    <table width="90%" border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0  border=0>
    I don't suppose you can tell us which WYSIWYMG editor created this?
  • 07-14-2008 7:27 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    drinkingbird:

    AccessGuru:

    Dude, I've built over 30 enterprise-level ODBC database apps.  I bet you can't even program in sequel.  

     

    SQLs not a programming language, it's a query language, so noone can really program in it. Procedural augmentations to SQL such as PL/SQL are a different matter.

     

    He really called you out on this one, didn't he GURU???

    Filed under:
  • 07-14-2008 8:48 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    drinkingbird:
    SQLs not a programming language, it's a query language, so noone can really program in it. Procedural augmentations to SQL such as PL/SQL are a different matter.

    In b4 someone mentions "Turing completeness".

    < pstorer> Bans don't mean shit on the forum. It's like being on the Sex Offender List. You can still entice kids into your van with candy.

    Want more? Go the IRC channel #TDWTFMafia on irc.slashnet.org.

    Bush^3 vs. /O(s|b)ama Bi(n La)?den/ -- YOU DECIDE!
    Filed under:
  • 07-15-2008 7:47 AM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    Enjoy your mug.
    I guess I'm back.

    Please continue to spam the addresses below.

    PLEASE SPAM:
    jtobin@ohioinstituteofhealthcareers.edu
    jtobin@ohiobusinesscollege.edu
  • 07-15-2008 7:48 AM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    AccessGuru:

    Dude, I've built over 30 enterprise-level ODBC database apps.  I bet you can't even program in squirrel.  

    FTFY
    I guess I'm back.

    Please continue to spam the addresses below.

    PLEASE SPAM:
    jtobin@ohioinstituteofhealthcareers.edu
    jtobin@ohiobusinesscollege.edu
  • 07-15-2008 11:29 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    I actually built a very basic computer out of squirrels once.  It consisted of 64 squirrels in an array of boxes, each box having two rooms (or states).  When I wanted to increment the value of a register, a food pellet was dropped into a particular set of boxes.  I was able to do a few addition and subtraction calculations before the system had an overflow (some of the squirrels chewed their way out of the boxes).  

    World class IT solutions for your industry -- call for free quote
  • 07-15-2008 11:32 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

     

    TheDude:

    drinkingbird:

    SQLs not a programming language, it's a query language, so noone can really program in it. Procedural augmentations to SQL such as PL/SQL are a different matter.

     

    He really called you out on this one, didn't he GURU???

    Yes, he did.  But the fact of the matter is that I wrote a Sequel compiler in phpGTK for importing into DB2 and wrapped it in a Joomla plugin.  I don't hear you making such claims. 

    World class IT solutions for your industry -- call for free quote
  • 07-16-2008 10:40 AM In reply to

    • KenW
    • Top 50 Contributor
    • Joined on 07-19-2005
    • Posts 405

    Re: Making really sure

    AccessGuru:
    30 enterprise-level ODBC
     

    The real WTF is someone posting nonsense like this, and using "AccessGuru" as a username in these forums also has a sig that mentions "World class IT solutions". Access/Guru/World class solutions/enterprise-level ODBC? Can you say "oxymoron"?

  • 07-16-2008 11:48 AM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    You wrote a Sequel(Lisp or SQL?) compiler in a web scripting language using a GUI framework, and then did som completely irrelevant things using a database and a CMS? Sounds like a really good setup for someone aspiring on getting a Swampy-award(tm).

  • 07-16-2008 12:46 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    KenW:

    You wrote a Sequel(Lisp or SQL?) compiler in a web scripting language using a GUI framework, and then did som completely irrelevant things using a database and a CMS? Sounds like a really good setup for someone aspiring on getting a Swampy-award(tm).

     

    It was for Sequal Server.  I was going to use ASP.NET but I'm still trying to install the framework.  

    World class IT solutions for your industry -- call for free quote
  • 07-16-2008 1:36 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    AccessGuru:
    It was for Sequal Server.  I was going to use ASP.NET but I'm still trying to install the framework.  
     

    WTF is 'Sequal Server'???

    Jesus christ.... do you mean MSSQL Server?

     

    I think KenW might have you pegged correctly...

     

    AccessGuru:
    I was going to use ASP.NET but I'm still trying to install the framework.  

    I am sure you mean the .NET framework, which is incredibly quick and easy to install.... 

    I mean wow.... just wow...

  • 07-16-2008 1:43 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    AccessGuru:

    KenW:

    You wrote a Sequel(Lisp or SQL?) compiler in a web scripting language using a GUI framework, and then did som completely irrelevant things using a database and a CMS? Sounds like a really good setup for someone aspiring on getting a Swampy-award(tm).

     

    It was for Sequal Server.  I was going to use ASP.NET but I'm still trying to install the framework.  

    There's comedy, there's high comedy, and then there's your insane attempt to impress us.
  • 07-16-2008 1:57 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    AccessGuru:

    Dude, I've built over 30 enterprise-level ODBC database apps.  I bet you can't even program in sequel.  

     

    I know some people pronounce it "sequel" - but I don't because it just seems silly*

    Whatever people want to pronounce it, it is pronounced that way, not written that way. Or do you also write ay es pee dot net?

     

    *Note: I am not a DBA, maybe if I were one all the other DBAs would laugh at me calling it S-Q-L!

    Linux is not a code base. Or a distro. Or a kernel. It's an attitude. And it's not about Open Source. It's about a bunch of people who still think vi is a good config UI.

    Notice: Phorm, and it's agents including ISPs collecting data on Phorm's behalf, are specifically forbidden from performing any processing or monitoring of the content of the above post. Hence, under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 any such attempt to profile this page by Phorm or it's agents is illegal.
  • 07-16-2008 4:32 PM In reply to

    • duder
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 06-26-2008
    • Posts 5

    Re: Making really sure

    You are so amateur. Just yesterday I made an inventory app with Cold Fission that merges XML and CSV data in YAML, and then inputs into a BLOB field of a File Maker Pro database. It all runs on a Palm so that we can scan RFIDs in the warehouse.
  • 07-16-2008 5:19 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    MasterPlanSoftware:

    AccessGuru:
    It was for Sequal Server.  I was going to use ASP.NET but I'm still trying to install the framework.  
     

    WTF is 'Sequal Server'???

    Jesus christ.... do you mean MSSQL Server?

    Oh no, I cringe on the "Sequel Server" pronunciation ... but "Sequal"? Sounds like the jigawatt syndrome!

    Ok, I'm back on working with my deebeetoo and saibeize projects...

  • 07-16-2008 5:23 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    danixdefcon5:
    I cringe on the "Sequel Server" pronunciation
     

    I don't. I firmly believe that only an idiot would care if you call it S-Q-L or sequel. But to write it out? Holy jesus. That is a whole different level.

     

    And yeah, we have already had that flamewar, so spare us your feeling on the subject. Anyone who cares has too much time on their hands.

  • 07-16-2008 5:36 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    MasterPlanSoftware:

    I don't. I firmly believe that only an idiot would care if you call it S-Q-L or sequel. But to write it out? Holy jesus. That is a whole different level.

    And yeah, we have already had that flamewar, so spare us your feeling on the subject. Anyone who cares has too much time on their hands.

    Not really concerned on pronunciation; personally I refer to SAP as "sap", CICS as "sicks", RACF as "rack-F" and such. But I'm not about to write "Rack-F" ... kind of reminds me when we got a requirement for creating new users in the EL DAP server...

    Anyway, I'd definitely not put Access as something I'm an expert with. And writing "Sequel Server" in a C.V. isn't going to look so bright...

  • 07-16-2008 7:52 PM In reply to

    • Hitsuji
    • Top 150 Contributor
    • Joined on 11-21-2005
    • Cork - Ireland
    • Posts 224

    Re: Making really sure

    GettinSadda:

    I know some people pronounce it "sequel" - but I don't because it just seems silly*

    *Note: I am not a DBA, maybe if I were one all the other DBAs would laugh at me calling it S-Q-L!

     

    I know we've had this discussion here before (probably many times) but if I recall correctly the pronounciation of SQL as 'sequel' appears to be Microsoft specific.

  • 07-16-2008 8:55 PM In reply to

    Re: Making really sure

    Hitsuji:
    I know we've had this discussion here before (probably many times) but if I recall correctly the pronounciation of SQL as 'sequel' appears to be Microsoft specific.

    No, it comes from the pre-cursor to SQL called SEQUEL developed by IBM.  When SQL became an ANSI standard the "official" pronunciation became S-Q-L. 

    < pstorer> Bans don't mean shit on the forum. It's like being on the Sex Offender List. You can still entice kids into your van with candy.

    Want more? Go the IRC channel #TDWTFMafia on irc.slashnet.org.

    Bush^3 vs. /O(s|b)ama Bi(n La)?den/ -- YOU DECIDE!