The Daily WTF: Curious Perversions in Information Technology
Welcome to TDWTF Forums Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

Last post 01-27-2011 7:51 AM by kamilucky. 193 replies.
Page 4 of 4 (194 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 12-01-2007 9:57 AM In reply to

    • mfah
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 12-01-2007
    • Posts 117

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    I'm in - can I have member number 12154? :)

    Did the DBA thing 6/7/8 years ago with versions 7 and 8i.  Did some fairly extensive Y2K upgrades.  One night, about 2AM, I remember deleting a data file before dropping a tablespace, and there was no way on earth Oracle would let me recover from it without doing a full restore.  Walked away from the whole product shortly after, and started evangelizing SQL Server, which is a much much better RDBMS.  I didn't mind the technical challenge of Oracle, but when it was in areas that didn't need to be challenging, it just got silly.  Keep the simple stuff simple is what I say.

    Pet hates?  The installer (at least it's improved from the old Oracle 7/Developer 2000 days, but that's not saying much), TNSNAMES (management flat out refused to even consider putting them in a directory service or on a network share, so I ended up having to cook up a logon script to copy new TNSNAMES.ORA files to client PCs), the way you can never really be sure what ORACLE_HOME 3rd party software is using (I spend a lot of time troubleshooting those problems for our developers), Forms and Discoverer, ADI (it never worked and was incompatible with their other products when installed on the same machine), JInitiator (or anything Java based, for that matter), the old proprietary IP stack, having to interoperate with GW-BASIC (now there's a WTF all on it's own) for some ghastly mess one of our senior developers brewed up once, the extraordinarily high levels of maintenance required, and the whole general arrogance that surrounds the product.

    Does it still not support identity columns?  Add that to the list, if so.
     

  • 12-06-2007 2:47 PM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    I'm in.  Curse the motherless dog that came up with Commit!
    SpectateSwamp exposing aliens. Obviously the World needs SSDS


    [10:07] <fatdog> so from now on.. be sure to wear nice clean underwear
    [10:07] <mps> fatdog: That is simply not going to happen
  • 12-12-2007 6:55 PM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    I'm in. I had hair before I encountered the beast.
  • 01-15-2008 8:32 AM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    I gotta join this club. Started my IT career in '95 - did my first oracle install in 2005 - it's been the most inscrutable software i've ever encountered.
    I so regret getting it. In a windows environment i would challenge anyone to give a good reason to run Oracle instead of MS Sqlserver. I used to love bashing Microsoft, i never thought i'd actually be dreaming of the day when i could 'upgrade' to the Micorsoft offering.
    Oracle is a windows sysadmin's nightmare. I've had 3 periods of downtime each of over a week in the last 2 years. Has been the most stress i've ever encountered in my job. The best bit was that each time it turned out to be a fix taking less than 1hour. Not only do i feel dumb, exasperated, p1ssed off but i run into this Attitude everywhere i look for Oracle information. I call it the Oracle attitude and it goes like this: 'You shouldn't need to ask any questions cos all the answers are in the book, you lazy idiot, why can't you take a year off and read all the manuals and then you'll be able to use our beloved database. All Hail The Oracle!' (At this point you're supposed to get out your 3foot thick oracle manual and kiss it).

    i'd like to wipe my 4rse with the oracle documentation. i used to write manuals and readme's - in fact i still do sometimes. i've never seen so many circular references in official documentation before, or spent so much time searching for HOW to do something (which i think at least should be relatively simple). I am looking at it from a sysadmin point of view. I'll probably never create a database from scratch in my life. I look after networks, maintain hardware, sort out routing, that kind of thing. Right now i spend 2 hours a day over looking my network then i sit down with the Oracle O'Reilly take a deep breathe and read that for the rest of the day. Cos i've given up on Oracle support, on Oracle documentation and the courses are for someone who's dedicated to oracle and nothing else - i did the first course but it was like a crammer course, you need to go away and go over all the notes again before it sinks in.

    Last issue i had about 2 weeks ago, i escalated it with Oracle support after about a week - i couldn't connect to one of my databases, i was sure i'd done something silly and messed up the config - and if i've learned one thing its that oracle is very very fussy and the config has to be just right (which is why i backed up all my config b4 changing anything). Anyway after a week and a half and talking to half a dozen guys and running tons of diagnostics which didn't apply to my trivial situation, i gave up and called a contractor.

    He fixed it over the phone in 50 minutes. (half an hour of that call was talking about money). Oh, i should say to be fair that i had already sent him my old listener.ora file and my current one. Cut and pasted 4 lines from the old to the new and it all worked. The relief to be able to see my database again was amazing. The worst thing was i KNEW it was something to do with my listener.ora file, i told oracle support that, i even sent them the old and the new. (One of their guys advised me to drop all my tables and start again rebuilding the database). The other 2 down times were equally trivial - (although having downtime was definitely not trivial). So i felt truly dumb, the whole office was stressful cos one of the main servers was down, and that contractor made in less than 1hour half of my weekly wage.

    I think it has been worst mistake of my IT career when i listened to the salesman tell me that between oracle and sqlserver the maintenance overhead was about the same but oracle was more advanced and had more features and i believed him! So i'm suffering for that naive mistake. It has literally doubled my workload, i've never encountered such shocking support, (i have worked in support off and on many times, 1st line, 2nd line and 3rd line), and i don't think we gain any advantage as a company by having this app.

    I'm sure that oracle is brilliant - if you're ebay or amazon, but not otherwise. And don't believe the marketing hype - it is totally at odds with the support culture.
    It will probably take me a while to migrate all my databases and i'm sure it won't be easy but this database is a waste of time for a guy like me. And once i get approval i'm off out of the land of Oracle :-)

    Just one example of what i consider a typical waste of time on planet Oracle: You install on windows2003 server and you have to manually create environmental variables - if you want to be able to connect that is - and it doesn't say this in the windows2003 install guide? How could they miss out something so simple yet so critical? Stuff like this happens time and time again - even on the course the teacher was telling us things which she just happened to know which weren't documented.

    It's not stupid to ask someone how to do something rather than read a manual for 4 hours. Nor is it necessarily a sign of intelligence if you know something obscure that no-one else knows because it is so hard to find out.

    What i rate as intelligent is the ability to design something that someone else can learn and use relatively quickly, and then in subsequent versions to make it yet more intuitive and logical to use (tho i must admit 10g Enterprise Manager is a great improvement on the 9i one). I can't rate intelligence as the ability to pour scorn on all criticism and tell them to go away and read the book. I'm going to go away and install something else.

    I admit i don't know the intricacies of databases, i'm sysadmin, but i'm not going to be intimidated by the Oracle Attitude anymore, maybe it is the greatest database in the world but who cares? Wasn't Betamax technically better than VHS? When i started in IT we used to replace Netware servers with NT4 boxes. Technically netware was definitely better - quicker, less restarts, needed less resources but who won that battle?

    Laugh as much as you want at MS Sqlserver oracle gurus - it's not just about being technically the best. What about usability? learnability? Interoperability with your O/S? All convoluted obscure solutions with high learning curves and requiring high maintenance will always be replaced - eventually.

    Well I didn't mean to write so long - guess i have 2 years of frustration to get out!



     

  • 01-31-2008 11:24 AM In reply to

    • dlikhten
    • Top 75 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-27-2007
    • New York Citeyah
    • Posts 670

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    I would like to be in...

    Has anyone tried writing an application for "Workflow" in Oracle Apps? GOD FORBID you need to actually install it to a client (requires you to insert manually points which draw a picture in the workflow into a database, buncha different tables, took weeks, and if you need to modify the workflow... YAY a whole new script... [we almost had to write a generator to compile oracle meta data into a insert script])

     

    Most of the time an error occures the following is gotten:

    "Error: Commit happened during workflow" (we needed to create temporary tables for w/e reason which is auto-commit) so we could never figure out what the error was. The only way is to turn on debugging which we had to print to a "debugging" table in our schema which was a whole nother annoyance to write... Basically when shit went wrong we had to step though client code to attempt to figure what error actually happened... YAY!

    Code is like a box of chocolates. You never know who stuck a turd in there and why.
    The Stupidest Man On Earth
    SSDS Bug: Program should not start up
  • 03-17-2008 1:28 PM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Yes. Just...yes.

     I wanna be number -1/2! Is that still available? 

    "The world of technical support is like a reflecting pool. To those who exist outside, it appears to be a deep, mystical place; bottomless, terrifying, foreign. The truth, however, is that the pool is only about three feet deep, and the bottom is grainy silt over sharp, hurty rocks."
  • 03-17-2008 3:26 PM In reply to

    • ammoQ
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-13-2005
    • Vienna.Austria.Europe.Earth
    • Posts 3,530

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    dlikhten:

    "Error: Commit happened during workflow" (we needed to create temporary tables for w/e reason which is auto-commit) so we could never figure out what the error was.

    Well... I can think of no reason why temporary tables have to be created exactly in the middle of a script, instead of "in advance".

     

    The only way is to turn on debugging which we had to print to a "debugging" table in our schema which was a whole nother annoyance to write... Basically when shit went wrong we had to step though client code to attempt to figure what error actually happened... YAY!

     

    Looks like you are not aware of dbms_output, pragma autonomous transaction or the SQL trace facilities in Oracle. MayI propose you better learn your stuff before you work with a sophisticated tool like Oracle?

    beanbag girl 4ever ... or maybe Astah girl?
  • 03-24-2008 12:03 PM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    While Oracle based systems "pay the bills" (love/hate relationship??) I'm in, if for no other reason, the nefarious ORA-1405 error.  If you've never encountered the -1405 error, it's a wonderous thing - ever get a null value back from a stored procedure/function/SQL query?  In C, that's an ORA-1405 error.  Yes, an error.  Granted, NULL values can do magical things in C, but c'mon!

  • 03-30-2008 5:08 AM In reply to

    • ammoQ
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-13-2005
    • Vienna.Austria.Europe.Earth
    • Posts 3,530

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    DoctorFriday:

    While Oracle based systems "pay the bills" (love/hate relationship??) I'm in, if for no other reason, the nefarious ORA-1405 error.  If you've never encountered the -1405 error, it's a wonderous thing - ever get a null value back from a stored procedure/function/SQL query?  In C, that's an ORA-1405 error.  Yes, an error.  Granted, NULL values can do magical things in C, but c'mon!

     

    Except when you use indicator variables to catch those null values.

    e.g.

    void stupid() {
      EXEC SQL BEGIN DECLARE SECTION;
      int dummy;
      short i1;
      EXEC  SQL END DECLARE SECTION;

      EXEC SQL select null into :dummy:i1 from dual;

      if (i1==-1)
       printf("yeah, it's really null\n");
    }

     

    That said, I aggree that this behaviour is annoying and unnecessary with varchar2 columns (resp. strings in C). 

    beanbag girl 4ever ... or maybe Astah girl?
  • 04-04-2008 11:59 AM In reply to

    • vr602
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 11-07-2006
    • London
    • Posts 70

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Yes please count me in, woot and all that stuff. I had to do some work on Oracle some years ago, and yes I did hate it - you couldn't do 'update A set A.this = B.this from A,B where...' you had to do some horrible subquery with 'where exists' eeuugh. And what's all that stuff with dual, has that gone yet? And also I'm a Sybase fan(ex-consultant, so keep your tomatoes to yourselves), so fully willing to boost Sybase over Oracle given the chance, in the interest of keeping my speciality alive.

  • 04-08-2008 12:29 PM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Ack, I thought I was already a member... Count me in.

  • 04-24-2008 7:56 AM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

     I want human cloning to be legal just so I can join this club twice.

  • 04-24-2008 10:53 AM In reply to

    • Erick
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 08-18-2006
    • South Carolina
    • Posts 46

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    I'm joining the club as well.

    Oh Oracle, how do I hate thee? Let me count the ways...

    1) The empty string is null. This feature rotted my brain to the point that I assumed it was true for other databases. In working with a SQL Server DB, documentation told me that when inserting rows to a certain table, a certain column should be blank. I made it null. The application failed because it was looking for the empty string, not null. Grrr, why can't everyone pick a standard?

    2) While attempting to come up with a query for a report, I needed to perform a full outer join between two tables. I run my query and get "SQL command not properly ended." I check the query umpteen times and wonder why it's flagging the outer join as the cause for the error. Can you guess? The query was against an Oracle 8i DB, which didn't have support for outer, inner, or any "join" phrasing other than the (+) style join. So how was I to do my full outer join?

    SELECT BLAH FROM A, B WHERE A.FOO = B.FOO (+) UNION SELECT BLAH FROM A, B WHERE A.FOO (+) = B.FOO

    So instead of having a nice, clean, query I have to violate the DRY principle for the sake of an older DB.

    3) Installing Oracle 11g on my new machine and seeing it refuse to support the aforementioned 8i DB. Sigh. 10g is as high as I can go.

    4) When attempting to install 10g, when I didn't pick the right flavor of installer, I got a friendly error message that was great fun to show to my coworkers:

    Abnormal Program Termination. An internal error has occured. Please provide the following files to Oracle Support: "Unknown" "Unknown" "Unknown"

  • 04-28-2008 5:25 PM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    I despise oracle.  

  • 05-26-2008 11:40 PM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Well, Alex,

      I do not care about a low membership number.

      I do care about semantics. I propose to rename the club to "I-loathe-Oracle-Club".

    cklam

  • 05-27-2008 9:00 AM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    cklam:

    Well, Alex,

      I do not care about a low membership number.

      I do care about semantics. I propose to rename the club to "I-loathe-Oracle-Club".

    cklam

    What the fuck are you bitches babbling about?
    SpectateSwamp exposing aliens. Obviously the World needs SSDS


    [10:07] <fatdog> so from now on.. be sure to wear nice clean underwear
    [10:07] <mps> fatdog: That is simply not going to happen
  • 06-01-2008 6:58 PM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    belgariontheking:

    cklam:

    Well, Alex,

      I do not care about a low membership number.

      I do care about semantics. I propose to rename the club to "I-loathe-Oracle-Club".

    cklam

    What the fuck are you bitches babbling about?

    Hey, he's got 53 whole posts, I think that entitles him to rename some forums, don't you?  Show some respect for goodness' sake!

    Your utterly arbitrary convention is the opposite of my utterly arbitrary convention! Get out of here!
  • 06-24-2008 3:20 PM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

     Meh, I guess I'm in.

    I KNOW that I'll be flamed for the above post - and it brings me great joy.
  • 06-29-2008 3:30 AM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Hrm, I thought I joined, but I guess not.

     A few years ago, I helped on working to port a rather well known forum system to Oracle. The other programmer on the project had already gotten a working prototype of the software running on Oracle, but wanted some help running Q&A and someone to try and run the installation from the very beginning to make sure everything worked out before he sent the patches upstream. Now, I'm not a fulltime DBA, but I've got a few years experience with PostgreSQL, and MySQL, as well as some experience with a bunch of other database products (mostly interbase/firebird and MS SQL). I figured, it can't be that hard to setup a dev system, and help my friend test the new database driver.

     At the time, I had no experience with the beast, but the trouble began with the freaking installer (I think it was 9, but I don't remember for sure). It would just randomly crap out half-way for no clear reason. A rather frustation experience which was only solved after a lot of googling and trial and error. I think the result required me copying all the files from the CD to the harddrive and installing from there, but I'm not 100% sure.

     Ok, so I got through the install, the rest should be relatively easy to get Oracle bound to the loopback device, get PHP talking to it, and run through the installation. Nope, not at all. Getting Oracle to even properly initalize its own database was somewhat tricky, but closely following the documentation, I was able to get it all the work, and run smoothly; I even got to SQL*Plus to talk nicely to it via a socket interface (I think, its been awhile since I made this setup work).

    I don't remember how long it took, or how many obsecure configuration files I had to go through before I found I needed to run EXEC DBMS_XDB.SETLISTENERLOCALACCESS(FALSE) on the command prompt to make all work. Looking at the oracle documentation now, this is noted in the quick start guide, but it would have saved me a heap of time back then.

     I realize Oracle is a complex and powerful piece of software, but they make it difficult to even get started on it; its almost if you need to be a certified DBA just to play with it a little. I wasn't even doing any real development work; I was simply testing our product against a newly created database backend. It's like they tried hard to make the simple things impossible to figure out without constantly googling, or (trying to) make sense of the Oracle docs.

    TDWTF Forum Moderator
  • 07-06-2008 2:29 AM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

     Started with Oracle 5 running on DOS... Now working with 10g... I've known Oracle for half it's life, and although it is getting older, it's not getting better...

  • 07-11-2008 5:52 AM In reply to

    • spajus
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 05-29-2008
    • Posts 1

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Count me in. Here's why.

  • 07-11-2008 10:48 AM In reply to

    • ammoQ
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-13-2005
    • Vienna.Austria.Europe.Earth
    • Posts 3,530

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    spajus:

    Count me in. Here's why.

     

    I don't understand your reasons, sorry. But welcome to the IHOC, anyway.

    beanbag girl 4ever ... or maybe Astah girl?
  • 07-11-2008 4:23 PM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    (Added to my Sent mail folder just now) 

    to:  larry.ellison@oracle.com

    subject: i hate you

    Just wanted to give some constructive criticism.  I hate you, I hate your product, I hate Oracle DBAs.  Because you suck.
    Here are some details (about the product, only you know why you suck so much):
    http://forums.thedailywtf.com/forums/t/1146.aspx

  • 07-28-2008 5:15 PM In reply to

    • Vechni
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-12-2007
    • Baltimore, MD
    • Posts 192

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

     Hello all.

    Tier 3 internets explorer
  • 08-30-2008 3:25 AM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    I joined today just to say that I, too, hate Oracle.

     

  • 12-24-2008 4:09 PM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Membership threads should always be at the top of the forum.  Bump!

    Not sure if I technically qualify, as I've never used Oracle directly.  However, I do administer a program which makes use of Oracle in production and QA, but MySQL in dev.  Getting a change which requires a database change migrated from dev to qa is a pain and a half.  A change that took 15 minutes to research (I'm not a DBA), 5 minutes to enter, and 25 minutes for MySQL to implement takes our Oracle team days or even weeks to do in QA.  I don't usually know what the actual issues are, as I only have access to the database-independent code.  However, I'm given the distinct impression it's not a manpower issue, as we had three Oracle DBAs on priority call for a while when the project was overdue on a particular deliverable the CIO wanted, and simple changes still took days to implement.

    Note that I'm talking about getting things implemented in QA, here, not production.  I fully understand and agree with production changes taking one to three weeks, just for notification purposes.  However, adding a column to a small table (only 100k rows, the MySQL version only took 150M including indexes after the change was made) took nearly a week, and I just don't understand why.  Of course, this issue was known about in advance, which is why we use MySQL in dev.

    morbiuswilters:There should be some kind of website where people can tell of outlandish technical and management failures like this.

    QFT.

    Speakerphonedude:
    Breaking news: "FTFY" has reached market saturation and is now in danger of becoming and became a cliche, just like long before "Pedantic Dickweed" was ever a thing.

    FTFY

  • 12-24-2008 7:13 PM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Ok.. I just have to say that although your example of adding a column is pretty simple.. just in general, the concept of using a totally different database system in development versus the one you deploy on is incredibly stupid. I mean, this is even worse than the problem we had where our Oracle DBA/developer insisted upon deploying dev database changes oin a manual and ad hoc basis rather than using automated update scripts (with SQL statements that we had tested). If the QA team is implementing a change in another database system, then you have actually two dev teams and two products (one mysql, one Oracle). Its incredibly retarded. Even having two different versions of the same database (Oracle 9i vs. 10g for example) is untenable. YOUR DEV AND TESTING ENVIRONMENTS MUST MATCH YOUR PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT AS EXACTLY AS POSSIBLE. Using a different database is ridiculous. Now, having said all of that I understand why your programmers might prefer mysql. Of course, if they had some kind of licensing or other issue they gave for using mysql in dev, it was invalid as Oracle Express is available for developers. And if there is some reason that supposedly Oracle is necessary for production, that is also invalid as mysql can almost certainly handle the performance requirements (there are few exceptions, give me the performance etc details of your database and I will verify that). If its transaction support or something then they should use the InnoDB engine. The fact that you have three Oracle DBAs is compounding the issue. Here's what you do.. save yourself a half a million or more dollars a year and SCRAP ORACLE AND FIRE ALL OF THE DBAS. I would say the situation you are in is insane and you should find another job. Your CIO should be fired because he should have recognized that a long time ago.
  • 01-07-2009 4:13 PM In reply to

    • froid
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 01-07-2009
    • Posts 1

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Sign me up! We use Oracle DB, Peoplesoft, Siebel Loyalty, Hyperion, Campaign Managemernt, Oracle Warehouse Builder, etc. etc. They all suck, but not nearly as much as their support and marketing teams.

    Now I'm not just a user, I'm a member too!

  • 01-28-2009 10:42 PM In reply to

    • rudraigh
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 02-07-2008
    • Ess Eff Bayeria
    • Posts 112

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Sign me up. Oracle is the most obtuse POS I've ever had to deal with.
  • 02-09-2009 3:10 AM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Member 180, reporting in!  (Ok, that was just the post count, didn't count the number of unique posters.)

    NVL, NVL2!?  WTF!?

  • 04-29-2009 11:25 AM In reply to

    • parris
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 08-28-2008
    • Posts 3

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    ORA-01799 just put me over the edge.
  • 05-02-2009 3:37 PM In reply to

    • linnah
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 05-02-2009
    • Posts 1

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

     Sign me up :)

  • 05-28-2009 1:42 AM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Ok, I feel obligated to "join" after having read several (dozens) of the IHOC threads... But I don't per-se belong, because the closest I've been is in college, I took a DB class, and the book included Oracle 10(g?) of some sort on like 4 cd's.  I took one look at that, and asked the prof if all our work had to be done on Oracle, as I'm a LAMP boy myself. Showed him my working stack one day after class in the first week, and asked if I could just LAMP to do my work.

    He was totally okay with that. At the end of the semester, I had several classmates who still hadn't managed to get the software to install. One guy went so far as to reformat his laptop (it was overdue anyways) and after Windows XP, drivers, and minimum updating, he still couldn't get the damned thing to install. Meanwhile, I had a fully working simple web based db app.  So... three months to install Oracle, and it still won't go? I don't know if that's TRWTF, but I'm willing to go out on a little faith here...

    morbiuswilters: Oh, and this entire thread is pointless, flamebait spam. Heckuva job, drachy...
    Prepare for a life in hell, a thankless job where you service the dregs of society. Kinda like being a hooker that works in a crack house.

    "we don't appreciate political/nationalist/technology flamebaiting here, please do not do this" and this is why mods shouldn't be able to permanently delete threads... some of us can't read the historical entries and see what the problem was...
  • 06-10-2009 9:35 AM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

     Im joining. A database that breaks and the only way to get it back is to perform a strange ritual involving SQLPLUS is fuckin insane. And the database is not the worst of the products labeled ORACLE. The stuff they bought from Stellent is decent tho.

    So all know who I am:
    MasterPlanSoftware:


    Congratulations you are the TRWTF.

  • 06-17-2009 9:47 AM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    I'm in! How about our DBA who says she "doesn't do data" or "doesn't do SQL".. but is "very busy with my own work" all day. Uhh... if your work isn't "data" or "SQL", I'm guessing all that's left is babysitting the database?

  • 06-17-2009 10:09 AM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    johnt519:

    I'm in! How about our DBA who says she "doesn't do data" or "doesn't do SQL".. but is "very busy with my own work" all day. Uhh... if your work isn't "data" or "SQL", I'm guessing all that's left is babysitting the database?

    If she's not doing data, she must be doing base.  I'm not entirely certain what that means; probably freebasing.

    Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.
  • 04-27-2010 5:05 PM In reply to

    • PHY6
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 04-27-2010
    • Posts 1

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Count me in. "...You wanna be where you can see / Our troubles are all the same..."
  • 05-04-2010 7:58 AM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Yeah, great idea!

    Some time  ago I naively thought that ORacle was a database for professionals developed by professionals, and I had great esteem for those people working with Oracle. Now, just a few days after having had to work with it, my high esteem was replaced by commiseration.

    By the way, since Oracle cannot be installed in a "correct" manner for Windows (because C:\Program Files has a blank in the path), I created a directory C:\Legacy and there it went. The same with the Oracle Client.

  • 10-04-2010 1:38 PM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    There was a time when I thought it was just another conscienceless big corp. But it does seem more and more likely that it is in fact a cooperation of wholehearted evil, earning money is a secondary priority, making the world a crappier place to live in is the real goal.
  • 10-25-2010 12:41 PM In reply to

    • Xyro
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 06-10-2007
    • Location location = new EnterpriseLocatorFactory() .newLocator(Locale.US) .getLocationFacade(this, true) .getLocation();
    • Posts 1,715

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    I don't care much about Oracle, but I hate their JDBC objects with an ever-renewing passion.  Today I learned that if you call a toString() on their unfortunately-named oracle.sql.INTERVALDS object, it will outright lie to you.  The string "0:0:0.100" doesn't mean zero hours, zero minutes, and a tenth of a second.   No, it means zero hours, zero minutes and 100 nanoseconds.  Whaaat the ffuuuuuuuu

    So sign me up.

    #!/usr/bin/perl

    ($_,@x,@y,$r,$o)=( "Xyro's signature!", 0xe4e10e9d0a4803ea, 0x92b0b7684cda510e,
    0x9d2a504b06a54c04, 0xb04804bca984dc0c, 0xea4889b4dadb1108, 0x90534665a4c79811)
    ;%_=map{$_,1}split//;%_=map{$o++,$_}sort keys%_;@x=map{sprintf'%x',$_}@x;for(@x
    ){$r.=$_{hex$_}for(split//)}$r=~s$Xa$xa$;$_=$r;s;(^|! )(\w+);$1\u\L$2;g;print#!
  • 12-23-2010 3:16 PM In reply to

    • juancn
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 07-23-2009
    • Posts 1

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    I actually work at Oracle and I want to be a member! I hate them because it's slowly destroying a good thing. I hate them because they made me hate my job. It's sad because a good group is being slowly disbanded. A great product being destroyed, bit by bit, with its utter lack of understanding and arcane practices. I hate them because I'll have to leave. There's no future here but I'm very fond of the people I work with every day. I see their souls (and mine) being eaten away slowly. Only the worst remain at Oracle in the long run. I don't want to go, but I have to.
  • 01-07-2011 12:35 AM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    yup
  • 01-20-2011 10:21 AM In reply to

    • dtech
    • Top 50 Contributor
    • Joined on 11-13-2007
    • Dutchland
    • Posts 878

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    juancn:
    I actually work at Oracle and I want to be a member! I hate them because it's slowly destroying a good thing. I hate them because they made me hate my job. It's sad because a good group is being slowly disbanded. A great product being destroyed, bit by bit, with its utter lack of understanding and arcane practices. I hate them because I'll have to leave. There's no future here but I'm very fond of the people I work with every day. I see their souls (and mine) being eaten away slowly. Only the worst remain at Oracle in the long run. I don't want to go, but I have to.
    Let me guess, former Sun developer?

    [edit] Btw, that is also the reason that I would like to join the IHOC. [/edit]

  • 01-27-2011 7:51 AM In reply to

    Re: Official Membership Thread -- Just Reply Here!

    Stupid, perverse and generally uninformative error messages!

Page 4 of 4 (194 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4
Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems